What Adoption Is (and Isn’t)

Derek, Alastair, and Matt continue their discussion of Begotten or Made? with an examination of adoption.

Today, the Mere Fidelity crew tackle adoption. We’re drawing on the following text from Oliver O’Donovan’s Begotten or Made:

Adoption is not procreation, and does not fulfil the procreative good of marriage. It is a charitable vocation indicated to childless couples by the personal tragedy of their deprivation in this area. And although it may richly compensate for the sorrow and satisfy the desire to nurture and educate children, it is still a substitute for procreation rather than a form of procreation. This is not to belittle or demean the adoptive relationship. Indeed, it might be said to praise it on altogether a higher level, inasmuch as it points beyond the natural goods of marriage to the supernatural good of charity. But adoption cannot be taken as a precedent for interpreting procreation as a simple enterprise of the will.

Oliver O’Donovan, Begotten or Made?, p. 40

Special thanks to MK Creative Arts for the audio editing.

Mere Fidelity is a listener-supported venture, and we can only grow as our supporters make it possible. Support Us on Patreon